跳转到文章内容

Around 945 million registered voters in India will have the opportunity to elect their representatives in the Lok Sabha.1 The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government has been in power since 2014. The latest polls suggest that Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi’s popularity will sweep him back into power at the next elections, although his party may have a diminished majority in Parliament. The opposition has formed a 26-party coalition under the acronym INDIA, but it lacks a unifying leader to rival Modi.

In its tenure, the BJP-led government has delivered tangible improvements. It has increased the number of social welfare programs and used the country’s impressive public digital infrastructure to deliver direct transfers of benefits, with less discretion in the selection of beneficiaries. There are more than 300 programs, ranging from a US$10 cooking gas cylinder to a US$2,000 house. They have reached nearly 950 million people and accounted for US$270 billion in government spending since 2017.2 Access to toilet facilities has greatly improved, and rural electrification and housebuilding have made a difference to peoples’ lives.

Investors appreciated the reduction of the corporate tax rate, the privatization of national carrier Air India, and the raised ceiling for foreign investment in insurance and defense. They also interpreted the recent interim budget as not leaving room for pre-election spending, as the government announced a slightly reduced deficit target for fiscal year 2025. What are their expectations for a third term? To deal with unfinished business.

Most investors expect a third term of a BJP-led government to continue pushing the “Make in India” agenda, which would attract foreign direct investment (FDI). They hope for enactment of the new labor law and infrastructure improvements because these are key requirements to attract FDI (the 2024 interim budget shows an increase in infrastructure funding to US$130 billion). Filling the vacant judgeships in the high courts and the subordinate courts would also be viewed as positive. Electrical power pricing is still in the hands of the state tariff-setting bodies that have been unable to balance political interest and consumer needs to deliver reasonably priced power. The introduction in 2017 of the Goods & Services Tax (GST) was revolutionary at the time, but it still doesn’t cover electricity, oil and gas, real estate, and alcohol. By and large, investors would like to see the current five GST rates reduced to one. Investors would like to see the public sector banks privatized, and the government should stop driving lending to priority sectors.

In our opinion, there is a lot of goodwill toward India, but international investors have high expectations; post-election policy execution is key to building investor confidence and therefore FDI.

But there is another reason to treat this term as an unrepeatable opportunity, because the framework for political representation in India could be radically different in five years’ time. Why? Because uneven population growth could radically change Indian election dynamics and the resulting policy direction in the future.

Overall, India has a relatively fast-growing population. But within India there is a wide variance. Broadly speaking, the southern states’ fertility rates have dropped to below replacement rates, with Kerala’s 1.5%3 close to Norway’s 1.4%.4 In the north, Bihar’s level is at 3.4%.5 In common with other democracies, India has a system of allocating political power in relation to the size of the population in its regions. But in 1976, during the “Emergency,”6 Parliament passed a constitutional amendment that froze the number of seats each state held, in accordance with the 1971 census. The freeze was to end in 2000, but it was extended to 2026. The demographic changes in these 50 years are significant. For example, representation for Bihar (population 95 million) is lower than for Kerala (28 million). It seems likely to us that there will be a significant change that will logically alter the political power balance of the states, resulting in changes in policy direction, which we think could be significant for investors in the future.

We have assessed the impact that past elections have had on India’s equity markets, and it seems to us that investing before elections can be strategically advantageous. Despite the risks, the Indian stock market, as measured by the S&P CNX Nifty Index, has consistently offered positive returns after elections, as seen in 2004 (16.1%), 2009 (38.7%) and 2014 (14.7%) over the one-year period following the election result date.7

The chart below depicts Indian stock market performance across 90 trading days before and after general election dates, beginning in 1996. On average, the stock market yielded a 3% return within roughly a month (22 trading days) following the election date. Yet, it's noteworthy that most stock market gains typically occur prior to the election, with an average return of 10% in the four months (88 trading days) leading up to the election results date.

India Equity Performance: 90 Days Around Election Dates
1996–2019

Sources: Indian National Stock Exchange, Macrobond. Analysis by Franklin Templeton Institute. The S&P CNX Nifty Index, also called the Nifty 50 or simply the Nifty, is a stock market index and one of several leading indexes for large companies, which are listed on National Stock Exchange of India. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com.

Our analysis covers seven past elections, revealing a unique instance in 2004 when the market declined both before and after the election. This election was exceptional, marking a period of significant volatility but ultimately delivering the highest returns of 108% (44% annualized) over the two-year span surrounding the election.8 High expectations for the BJP-led government's re-election under Atal Bihari Vajpayee characterized this period, buoyed by the optimistic "India Shining" campaign. Contrary to expectations, the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) won, initially leading to a 13.75% drop in the Nifty Index over the month following the election (22 trading days).9 However, the market recovered in the following year due to strong economic indicators.

The 2009 elections also stood out, with the stock market gaining 73.2% around 90 days before and after the election result date, driven by expectations of political continuity and economic growth.10 The UPA’s unexpected victory and formation of a stronger coalition led to a market rally, with the Nifty Index soaring 23.1% within a month after the election.11



Copyright ©2025 富蘭克林鄧普頓。版權所有。

本文件僅供一般參考。本文件不應被視作個人投資建議或買賣或持有任何基金股份或證券的要約或招攬。有關本文所提及的任何證券的資料並不足以用作制定投資決策。投資涉及風險。投資價值可升或跌,過往業績不代表或不保證將來的表現。投資收益是以資產淨值計算,已考慮股息再投資及資本增長或損失。投資收益以所示貨幣計價,該等貨幣可能是美元/港元以外的貨幣(「外幣」)。因此,以美元/港元交易的投資者需承受美元/港元與外幣之間匯率波動的風險。投資者應仔細閱讀銷售文件,以獲取進一步資料,包括風險因素。

本文件所載的數據、評論、意見、預測及其他資料如有更改恕不另行通知。不保證投資產品目標將會實現,亦不保證所示預測將會實現。表現亦可能受貨幣波動影響。流動性下降或會對資產價格產生不利影響。貨幣波動可能會影響海外投資的價值。如果投資產品投資於新興市場,風險可能高於投資於已發展市場。如果投資產品投資於衍生工具,則需承擔特定風險,這可能會增加投資產品承受的風險水平。如果投資產品投資於特定行業或地區,回報的波動程度可能高於更多元化的投資產品投資。富蘭克林鄧普頓不就使用本文件或其所載的任何評論、意見或估計而導致的任何直接或間接後果性損失承擔任何責任。在未得到富蘭克林鄧普頓的事先書面同意下,不得以任何方式複製、派發或發表本文件。

名稱中包含「(已對沖)」的任何股份類別將嘗試對沖本基金基礎貨幣與股份類別計值貨幣之間的貨幣風險,但不保證可以成功對沖。在某些情況下,投資者可能涉及額外風險。

若閣下對其中任何資料有疑問,謹請與閣下的財務顧問聯絡。

只適用於UCITS基金: 此外,投資者權利概要可從這裡獲得。根據 UCITS 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 UCITS 指令第 93a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

只適用於AIFMD基金:此外,投資者權利摘要可從這裡獲得。根據 AIFMD 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 AIFMD指令第 32a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

為避免疑問,如果您決定投資,即代表您將購買本基金的單位/股份,並不是直接投資於本基金的相關資產。

本文件由富蘭克林鄧普頓投資(亞洲)有限公司發行,並未為香港證監會所審閱。

除非另有註明,所有資料截至上述日期。資料來源:富蘭克林鄧普頓。

CFA® 及Chartered Financial Analyst®為特許金融分析師協會擁有的商標。