投稿人

Michael Browne
Investment Strategist,
Franklin Templeton Institute
As we enter 2024, British politicians are eyeing the calendar with a mixture of excitement and fear. Recently we have witnessed around a third of all MPs standing down, significant boundary revisions and the most solid lead for Labour since 1996 and the subsequent Tony Blair landslide of 1997. What can we look forward to in the market? Has the market already discounted any impact?
Key takeaways
- First positive household cashflows since Covid are benefiting property, builders and consumer sectors. We expect it to broaden into specialist retail and travel.
- Labour investment in green energy would likely be funded by a windfall tax on oil companies, similar to the 1997 tax on utilities.
- Markets are more likely to be focused on falling rates and recovery than electoral results and policies.
Firstly, and much to the irritation of pollsters, most people only make up their minds to vote a few days before the election date. The British public has been voting with a lower turnout since the peak in 1992.1 That suggests that there is still room for a surprise. And with improving economic news that inflation is falling sharply and growth is resuming, those MPs in vulnerable seats may yet survive.
Consumer stocks positioned to benefit from recovery
The economic policies of the two main protagonists, the incumbent Conservative Party and re-surgent Labour party are closer than they have been since 2010. Rising interest rates, high post-Covid debt are the key drivers while the lessons of ex-Prime Minister Liz Truss’s brief and disastrous dash for growth are all too fresh in the memory. But with growth in real wages in 2024 and a meaningful tax cut (National Insurance) the economy will start to grow again. Driven by positive household cash flows for the first time since the end of the Covid lockdown.2 With interest rates potentially falling as well, it is the recovery sectors of property, builders and consumers that are driving the rally already upon us. Expect this to broaden, taking in more of the consumer stocks from specialist retailers to holidays.
Windfall taxes and investment in renewables?
Could this continue post-election? Probably, but by then the rally heralding the new recovery will be well under way. There is certainly a focus on building out renewable energy from the Labour party, but how to fund that without tax rises from consumers or corporates. This is not unlike the “windfall tax” that Gordon Brown introduced on the utilities in 1997. In fact, it is worth remembering that he also cut corporation tax and capital allowance. The markets liked that first budget, with the independence of the Bank of England, the UK pound, weak before the election, rallied. The UK gilt market had an excellent year as yields that were 7.5% at the start of the year fell sharply after to 6.2%.3 Gordon Brown’s first budget in July 1997 featured cuts in corporation tax, increased incentives for companies to invest and a windfall tax on utilities. Rachel Reeves who is expected to be Labour’s first Chancellor of the Exchequer since 2010 in her speech to the Labour party, promised fiscal probity, a windfall tax on oil companies, and investment in green energy. Interestingly, the utility sector, which was hit by the “windfall tax” in 1997, rallied sharply after the election, having been subdued before it.4
Buying in UK favours lower inflation and the consumer sector
How will the Bank of England, in their role as the only economic restraining force, react to growth in 2024? They will continue to be “data dependent” and with three members of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) still voting for a rise, there is still a big split. But with the rest of Europe mired in contraction, and few signs of it ending, inflationary pressures are ebbing away. It is clear that supply chains are now properly repaired in the post Covid period. Put simply what cannot be sold in Europe will be sold in the United Kingdom, in particular building materials. Again, all this favours lower inflation and the consumer sectors.
Rates and recovery to dominate not elections and policy
So oddly, with a major reversion in electoral fortunes from 2019’s Conservative majority in the offing, the market may not have much to worry about. Falling rates and recovery are going to dominate the economic and market news, not elections and policy speeches. Blair and Brown were fortunate to inherit a decent economy in 1997 and chose to tread carefully. (Sir Keir) Starmer and Reeves may be equally lucky—they are certainly treading the path of their predecessors.
Endnotes
- Source: Statista, House of Commons; BBC, Turnout at elections. December 2019.
- Source: Office for National Statistics, December 2023.
- Source: Bank of England Quarterly bulletin, February 1998.
- Source: Morningstar. UK sector 12-month performance from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 1997.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal.
Fixed-income securities involve interest rate, credit, inflation and reinvestment risks; and possible loss of principal. As interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities falls.
International investments are subject to special risks including currency fluctuations, social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in emerging markets.
Commodities and currencies contain heightened risk that include market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions and may not be suitable for all investors.
US Treasuries are direct debt obligations issued and backed by the “full faith and credit” of the US government. The US government guarantees the principal and interest payments on US Treasuries when the securities are held to maturity. Unlike US Treasuries, debt securities issued by the federal agencies and instrumentalities and related investments may or may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the US government. Even when the US government guarantees principal and interest payments on securities, this guarantee does not apply to losses resulting from declines in the market value of these securities.
