跳转到文章内容

Key takeaways

  • We believe an upward trend in initial jobless claims signals weakness ahead, despite continued strong headline jobs numbers. Higher income cohorts have increasingly been filing claims, an atypical shift that could portend a bigger than expected drop in consumption in the back half of the year.
  • Other cracks beneath the surface are apparent across a wide array of labor market data, including a declining quits rate, weakening Conference Board job sentiment and a negative trend in hours worked. Historically, these data sets deteriorate ahead of the broader labor market.
  • With only modest progress toward loosening labor pressures, the Fed is likely to maintain interest rates at a higher level for longer than financial markets are currently pricing in.

Headline jobs strength obscures underlying weakness

U.S. equity markets stayed rangebound in May and leadership remains concentrated among the largest components of the S&P 500 Index. Specifically, the five largest members of the benchmark have delivered 85% of its total return this year, meaning the remaining 495 companies contributed just 15%. Deteriorating breadth is typically associated with a bull market on its last legs and not a solid foundation for a rally to build upon. Similar to equities, the U.S. labor market is also seeing deterioration beneath the surface while the headline figures remain resilient.

The labor market has proved the most solid pillar of the U.S. economy over the past several quarters, with an average of 314,000 jobs created each month in 2023, even as other areas of the economy have slowed substantially. In fact, initial prints for the last 14 monthly non-farm payroll (jobs) releases have surpassed consensus expectations, the longest run of consecutive beats in at least 25 years. Despite labor market resilience, we continue to believe initial jobless claims are the canary in the coalmine. Importantly, they have begun trending higher in recent months, consistent with their yellow or cautionary reading on the ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard.

Initial jobless claims tend to be volatile in any given week, which is why we evaluate them on a four-week moving average basis. While the trend in claims over the past three months appears to support a shift toward a higher level, a substantial shift in who is filing these claims is more telling. An increasing share of claims has been coming from the middle- and upper-income cohorts, while those filed by the lower-income cohorts have declined. This dynamic is atypical but not out of sync with headline job losses concentrated in the typically higher-paying technology and financial sectors. Given this unique shift toward higher earners losing their jobs, consumption may witness a bigger drop than expected later in 2023, given the current pickup in jobless claims.

Exhibit 1: Canary in the Coalmine

Data as of May 26, 2023. Source: Bloomberg, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

Other cracks beneath the surface are apparent in a wide array of labor market data. The Job Openings and Labor Turnover or JOLTs survey, for example, showed an improvement in the headline job openings figure in its most recent release, indicating improving labor demand. However, the quits rate within the survey — which measures how many workers are leaving their jobs and is another way of viewing the health of the labor market as most workers only quit to leave for a new job—fell back from the very high end of the pre-pandemic range, suggesting the labor market may actually be cooling to more normal levels.

Exhibit 2: Declining Quits Rate Signals Weakening Job Sentiment

Data as of April 30, 2023. Source: BLS, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) and Bloomberg. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

Fewer workers quitting in favor of new jobs is consistent with deteriorating job sentiment in the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence survey, one of the labor market indicators on the ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard. This indicator worsened to a red or recessionary level last month as the share of workers reporting jobs were plentiful had fallen, while those reporting jobs were hard to get had modestly risen, a trend that continues.

The jobs report itself also reveals multiple fractures not immediately evident. Although overall payroll gains remain strong, hours worked have been steadily falling since peaking in early 2021. Hours worked typically fall as the economy enters a recession, with employers cutting shifts in the face of declining demand. This measure has now slipped below the average level seen during the last expansion and shows no sign of stabilizing. The cut to hours worked coupled with the surge in hiring could be indicative of labor hoarding as businesses may be reluctant to reduce headcount after the hiring difficulties experienced in recent years. While labor hoarding can continue, we believe it’s only a matter of time before profitability pressures lead to cost-cutting measures, including layoffs.

Exhibit 3: Hours Worked Has Likely Peaked

Data as of May 31, 2023. Source: BLS, NBER and Bloomberg. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

In summary, headline labor market strength is obscuring weakening trends for overall employment and consumption. The headline numbers have slowed, but remain at too-high levels for inflation to drop back to the Fed’s 2% target. Wages in particular stand out, with average hourly earnings running above 4% for all workers and at 5% for production and non-supervisory workers, which account for about 80% of overall U.S. employment. Alternate wage measures like the Fed’s preferred Employment Cost Index and the Atlanta Fed’s Wage Growth Tracker are at similarly elevated levels inconsistent with 2% inflation. The wage problem is nothing new. In fact, wage growth was the first signal on the dashboard to turn both yellow and then red back in 2021. There are no changes to the dashboard this month.

Exhibit 4: ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard

Source: ClearBridge Investments.

Against this backdrop, the Federal Reserve (Fed) is likely to maintain interest rates at a higher level for longer than investors appreciate. While inflation has slowed, it remains far too high for comfort. Slowing the labor market to reduce wage gains and thus consumption will take time but should ultimately help bring inflation back down to target. Progress is being made, but more work is needed to tame price pressures. For equity investors, discount rates may shift higher or not drop as rapidly as the market is expecting, potentially pressuring valuations. Market pricing for monetary policy in the coming months appears to be converging toward the Fed’s expectations, which are for higher interest rates, however a divergence still exists. This lends us to continue to favor tilts toward stocks with defensive characteristics.



Copyright ©2025 富蘭克林鄧普頓。版權所有。

本文件僅供一般參考。本文件不應被視作個人投資建議或買賣或持有任何基金股份或證券的要約或招攬。有關本文所提及的任何證券的資料並不足以用作制定投資決策。投資涉及風險。投資價值可升或跌,過往業績不代表或不保證將來的表現。投資收益是以資產淨值計算,已考慮股息再投資及資本增長或損失。投資收益以所示貨幣計價,該等貨幣可能是美元/港元以外的貨幣(「外幣」)。因此,以美元/港元交易的投資者需承受美元/港元與外幣之間匯率波動的風險。投資者應仔細閱讀銷售文件,以獲取進一步資料,包括風險因素。

本文件所載的數據、評論、意見、預測及其他資料如有更改恕不另行通知。不保證投資產品目標將會實現,亦不保證所示預測將會實現。表現亦可能受貨幣波動影響。流動性下降或會對資產價格產生不利影響。貨幣波動可能會影響海外投資的價值。如果投資產品投資於新興市場,風險可能高於投資於已發展市場。如果投資產品投資於衍生工具,則需承擔特定風險,這可能會增加投資產品承受的風險水平。如果投資產品投資於特定行業或地區,回報的波動程度可能高於更多元化的投資產品投資。富蘭克林鄧普頓不就使用本文件或其所載的任何評論、意見或估計而導致的任何直接或間接後果性損失承擔任何責任。在未得到富蘭克林鄧普頓的事先書面同意下,不得以任何方式複製、派發或發表本文件。

名稱中包含「(已對沖)」的任何股份類別將嘗試對沖本基金基礎貨幣與股份類別計值貨幣之間的貨幣風險,但不保證可以成功對沖。在某些情況下,投資者可能涉及額外風險。

若閣下對其中任何資料有疑問,謹請與閣下的財務顧問聯絡。

只適用於UCITS基金: 此外,投資者權利概要可從這裡獲得。根據 UCITS 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 UCITS 指令第 93a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

只適用於AIFMD基金:此外,投資者權利摘要可從這裡獲得。根據 AIFMD 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 AIFMD指令第 32a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

為避免疑問,如果您決定投資,即代表您將購買本基金的單位/股份,並不是直接投資於本基金的相關資產。

本文件由富蘭克林鄧普頓投資(亞洲)有限公司發行,並未為香港證監會所審閱。

除非另有註明,所有資料截至上述日期。資料來源:富蘭克林鄧普頓。

CFA® 及Chartered Financial Analyst®為特許金融分析師協會擁有的商標。