跳转到文章内容

Key takeaways

The initial public offering (IPO) market needs a reset in pricing, not just activity. The key constraint is not issuance; it is establishing valuation frameworks that reflect how today’s companies are built and scaled.

Benchmark deals will define the next cycle. A small group of large, complex IPOs—potentially led by SpaceX—could shape how public markets value innovation across artificial intelligence (AI), infrastructure and platforms.

Value creation has shifted, raising the bar for investors. With more value realized in private markets and companies entering the stock market later, differentiation is increasingly driven from understanding businesses earlier, not simply accessing them at IPO.

Flagship IPOs could redefine how innovation is valued 

When SpaceX goes public early this summer, it could mark an important inflection point: resetting how public markets value a new generation of companies that were built and scaled in private.

IPOs from flagship companies like SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI represent something we haven’t had in this market cycle: a clear benchmark for how large, complex, next-generation platforms are priced once they transition to public markets.

This cycle was built differently

One of the most important shifts we’ve observed over the past decade is where value is created.

Innovation—particularly across AI, software and tech infrastructure—is increasingly developed and scaled in private markets. Companies are reaching significant size, refining their business models and, in some cases, achieving profitability before ever considering a public listing.

That’s a meaningful change from prior cycles.

For many tech companies, access to private capital has expanded, liquidity options have improved and management teams have more flexibility around timing. As a result, the IPO is no longer an inevitable milestone but a strategic choice. This reflects a broader shift in how companies are built, scaled and ultimately priced.

The rise of private scale:

  • US public companies down ~50% from peak
  • Global unicorns (private companies valued at US$1 billion+) now exceed 1,200
  • Median IPO age has nearly doubled (from six to 10–12 years)

Source: “Dream Exchange Market Report: 2025 Data Reveals 50% Decline in Total U.S. Listed Companies Since 1996 Peak; Highlights SPAC Dominance in New Offerings,” PR Newswire, January 20, 2026. In 1996 there were ~8,090 publicly listed companies, compared to 4,200 as of year-end 2025. In 2016 the number of unicorns was approximately 229.

Public markets are catching up

This dynamic has created a gap. Private markets have funded and scaled much of the current innovation cycle, while public markets have had to interpret that progress with less direct visibility.

We see that in a few ways:

  • Earnings power is often clearer before companies list
  • Key growth drivers, particularly in AI, are still being priced in real time
  • Valuation frameworks are adjusting to a more capital-intensive, longer-duration model

As these companies list, they will contribute to a more complete picture of how innovation is priced across different parts of the technology stack.

From private markets to public indexes

Many of the companies now coming to market are doing so with clear, established roles in the tech and innovation ecosystems. They will move directly from private companies to meaningful constituents in the S&P 500, MSCI World and MSCI World Information Technology indexes, transitioning from niche exposures to core components of broad market portfolios.

This shift has key implications:

  • Benchmark composition should evolve alongside the innovation cycle. As emerging leaders enter major equity indexes, benchmark composition will likely shift—reshaping sector weights, growth profiles and the characteristics of technology allocations themselves.
  • Understanding companies earlier matters more. By the time a company enters an index, its role in the business ecosystem (growth drivers, capital intensity and competitive position) is already established.

In our view, this reinforces the importance of understanding companies long before they become widely held in public markets.

Investing across private and public markets can mean deeper insights, sooner

Investing in both public and private markets has become increasingly important in this environment.

Much of the insight that informs our public market views comes from observing companies earlier in their lifecycle:

  • How they scale
  • Where demand is forming
  • How business models evolve

Our experience with private companies such as SpaceX, Databricks and Anthropic has reinforced this perspective. It is not just about exposure; it’s about context. This insight can help differentiate between short-term valuation adjustments and fundamental shifts in business quality.

A more selective cycle

While there is a meaningful pipeline of companies, we expect the next phase of IPO activity to be selective:

  • Companies will need to demonstrate scalability and durability
  • Profitability and earnings visibility will matter more
  • Valuation discipline may be higher across public markets

Rather than a broad reopening of the IPO window, this may look more like a measured transition, where companies come to market as conditions allow.

The bottom line

The IPO market has been waiting for a reset. A flagship deal like SpaceX could be the catalyst.

If that happens, we expect a gradual increase in IPO activity, a clearer alignment between private and public valuations, and a more selective environment overall.

For investors, the opportunity is not simply accessing innovation but understanding how and when it transitions between private and public markets.

Franklin Equity team (from left to right, Sara Araghi, Matt Adams, Matt Moberg, Grant Bowers, Matt Cioppa, Joyce Lin and Sophie Wiener) visits SpaceX.



Copyright ©2025 富蘭克林鄧普頓。版權所有。

本文件僅供一般參考。本文件不應被視作個人投資建議或買賣或持有任何基金股份或證券的要約或招攬。有關本文所提及的任何證券的資料並不足以用作制定投資決策。投資涉及風險。投資價值可升或跌,過往業績不代表或不保證將來的表現。投資收益是以資產淨值計算,已考慮股息再投資及資本增長或損失。投資收益以所示貨幣計價,該等貨幣可能是美元/港元以外的貨幣(「外幣」)。因此,以美元/港元交易的投資者需承受美元/港元與外幣之間匯率波動的風險。投資者應仔細閱讀銷售文件,以獲取進一步資料,包括風險因素。

本文件所載的數據、評論、意見、預測及其他資料如有更改恕不另行通知。不保證投資產品目標將會實現,亦不保證所示預測將會實現。表現亦可能受貨幣波動影響。流動性下降或會對資產價格產生不利影響。貨幣波動可能會影響海外投資的價值。如果投資產品投資於新興市場,風險可能高於投資於已發展市場。如果投資產品投資於衍生工具,則需承擔特定風險,這可能會增加投資產品承受的風險水平。如果投資產品投資於特定行業或地區,回報的波動程度可能高於更多元化的投資產品投資。富蘭克林鄧普頓不就使用本文件或其所載的任何評論、意見或估計而導致的任何直接或間接後果性損失承擔任何責任。在未得到富蘭克林鄧普頓的事先書面同意下,不得以任何方式複製、派發或發表本文件。

名稱中包含「(已對沖)」的任何股份類別將嘗試對沖本基金基礎貨幣與股份類別計值貨幣之間的貨幣風險,但不保證可以成功對沖。在某些情況下,投資者可能涉及額外風險。

若閣下對其中任何資料有疑問,謹請與閣下的財務顧問聯絡。

只適用於UCITS基金: 此外,投資者權利概要可從這裡獲得。根據 UCITS 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 UCITS 指令第 93a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

只適用於AIFMD基金:此外,投資者權利摘要可從這裡獲得。根據 AIFMD 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 AIFMD指令第 32a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

為避免疑問,如果您決定投資,即代表您將購買本基金的單位/股份,並不是直接投資於本基金的相關資產。

本文件由富蘭克林鄧普頓投資(亞洲)有限公司發行,並未為香港證監會所審閱。

除非另有註明,所有資料截至上述日期。資料來源:富蘭克林鄧普頓。

CFA® 及Chartered Financial Analyst®為特許金融分析師協會擁有的商標。