跳转到文章内容

Key takeaways

  • Iran-related tensions are raising the risk of energy/commodity supply disruptions, pushing up transport and input costs globally.
  • Infrastructure offers built-in inflation defense, with regulatory frameworks and long-term contracts often allowing cost (and inflation) pass-through, supporting cash flows even if valuations face near-term rate pressure.
  • Resilience varies by asset type, but the toolkit is broad: utilities in North America and Europe, pipelines and toll roads are positioned to withstand and grow through commodity-driven shocks.

Infrastructure’s cash flow characteristics provide inflation protection

The escalation of military tensions with Iran has led to supply disruptions across key energy and commodity markets, including oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and other critical resources moving through the Middle East. This has contributed to renewed inflation pressures globally as higher energy, transport and input costs flow through supply chains.

In this environment, infrastructure assets continue to be resilient because many operate under regulatory frameworks or long-term contractual structures that allow inflation and cost increases to be passed through to end users over time. As a result, while higher interest rates and macro volatility may create short-term valuation pressure, the underlying cash flow characteristics of infrastructure assets provide inflation protection during periods of geopolitical-driven commodity shocks.

North American utilities

We are seeing increased global commodity price volatility driven by geopolitical tensions, which is already placing upward pressure on power costs in some international markets and highlighting utilities’ exposure to fuel prices. While US natural gas prices have remained relatively stable to date, we believe a sustained increase would place upward pressure on electricity costs and affordability.

North American utilities are, however, largely insulated through cost-of-service regulation, which allows fuel and other operating costs to be recovered through customer tariffs. While higher input costs can create short-term pressure, the regulatory framework provides mechanisms for recovery, and allowed returns may adjust over time as capital market conditions change.

Our focus remains on utilities operating in constructive jurisdictions, where regulatory support and affordability outcomes may be better balanced, as identified through our detailed bottom-up investment process.

European utilities

Elevated oil and gas prices linked to Middle East tensions are increasing energy costs across Europe and adding to inflation pressures. In response, European governments are rolling out subsidies and targeted support measures to ease affordability pressures for households and industry, while sustaining energy demand for utilities. At the European Union (EU) level, policymakers are considering additional actions such as reducing energy taxes and subsidizing gas-fired generation, with a dual focus on preserving industrial competitiveness and advancing energy independence.

For regulated utilities operating within frameworks where returns on the regulated asset base are periodically reset, higher inflation and funding costs can be reflected in future tariffs. While there may be a lag before adjustments occur, regulatory structures typically allow inflation to be passed through to customers over time, helping preserve long-term asset value even in periods of energy-driven inflation. As such, we believe there is dual protection in the current environment; policy support underpins demand, while regulatory frameworks allow inflation to be reflected in pricing over time, supporting earnings resilience even if inflation persists.

North American pipelines

Energy infrastructure may be one of the more direct beneficiaries of current geopolitical disruptions. Higher oil and gas prices driven by supply uncertainty in the Middle East will likely trigger major importing countries to diversify their sources of energy. Following the 2022 Russia/Ukraine conflict, US LNG exports to Europe increased significantly as Europe looked to diversify away from Russian energy reliance as part of its REPowerEU initiative. In the current environment, we would expect Asian importing countries such as Japan and Korea to increasingly look to North American sources of oil and gas to reduce their reliance on the Middle East. In that context, projects such as LNG Canada Phase II and the Trans Mountain Expansion project have enhanced business cases. We would expect these demand-pull infrastructure projects, combined with a higher netback (profitability) environment for producers, to stimulate additional production activity across North America. This could translate to higher volumes handled by energy infrastructure assets such as pipelines, processing facilities and storage.

Regarding inflation, many pipeline assets operate under cost-of-service structures or long-term take-or-pay contracts with inflation escalators, providing a degree of protection from rising costs while benefiting from stronger volumes if global supply chains shift toward more stable producing regions.

Toll roads

The effects of recent oil price volatility driven by the conflict in Iran has a less pronounced impact on toll roads due to the mechanisms by which inflation is passed through for those assets. Many concession agreements allow tolls to increase in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or have predefined escalation mechanisms that capture the impact of higher energy prices, which are a component of this inflation. With regards to demand impacts, higher fuel prices may temporarily dampen discretionary travel. However, this typically represents the smallest segment of an urban toll road’s revenues at only 15%–30%, with business and freight travel less sensitive to cost pressures. Ultimately, revenue resilience remains strong, in our view, as inflation-linked pricing structures and fixed cost bases enable operators to offset macroeconomic headwinds and protect margins over time.

Airports

Airports are exposed to the current environment through higher aviation fuel costs and potential short-term impacts on travel demand (including reduced travel to regions affected by the conflict), particularly amid elevated cost of living pressures and oil price volatility linked to Iran. However, historically, the long-term trend of air travel demand has proven inelastic to both cost of living pressures and economic and price shocks (with the exception of COVID-19). Many airport revenue streams are either regulated or contractually linked to inflation, supporting resilience in the current inflationary backdrop. Aeronautical charges are often set using CPI-linked formulas, while commercial revenues such as retail, parking and property leases can adjust with passenger spending and pricing power. This combination could provide a mechanism to gradually pass inflation through to airport revenues despite near-term volatility in passenger volumes driven by higher fuel costs.

Contracted renewables

Renewable energy assets primarily operate under long-term fixed-price power purchase agreements (PPAs), which incorporate inflation expectations as part of the pricing assumptions at the outset. These assets are structurally less exposed to short-term volatility in fossil-fuel prices. While the agreements do not typically contain inflation pass-through mechanisms, sustained inflation-driven increases in oil and gas prices ultimately improve the relative competitiveness of renewable energy, resulting in increased demand for new projects and the potential for improved project returns.



Copyright ©2025 富蘭克林鄧普頓。版權所有。

本文件僅供一般參考。本文件不應被視作個人投資建議或買賣或持有任何基金股份或證券的要約或招攬。有關本文所提及的任何證券的資料並不足以用作制定投資決策。投資涉及風險。投資價值可升或跌,過往業績不代表或不保證將來的表現。投資收益是以資產淨值計算,已考慮股息再投資及資本增長或損失。投資收益以所示貨幣計價,該等貨幣可能是美元/港元以外的貨幣(「外幣」)。因此,以美元/港元交易的投資者需承受美元/港元與外幣之間匯率波動的風險。投資者應仔細閱讀銷售文件,以獲取進一步資料,包括風險因素。

本文件所載的數據、評論、意見、預測及其他資料如有更改恕不另行通知。不保證投資產品目標將會實現,亦不保證所示預測將會實現。表現亦可能受貨幣波動影響。流動性下降或會對資產價格產生不利影響。貨幣波動可能會影響海外投資的價值。如果投資產品投資於新興市場,風險可能高於投資於已發展市場。如果投資產品投資於衍生工具,則需承擔特定風險,這可能會增加投資產品承受的風險水平。如果投資產品投資於特定行業或地區,回報的波動程度可能高於更多元化的投資產品投資。富蘭克林鄧普頓不就使用本文件或其所載的任何評論、意見或估計而導致的任何直接或間接後果性損失承擔任何責任。在未得到富蘭克林鄧普頓的事先書面同意下,不得以任何方式複製、派發或發表本文件。

名稱中包含「(已對沖)」的任何股份類別將嘗試對沖本基金基礎貨幣與股份類別計值貨幣之間的貨幣風險,但不保證可以成功對沖。在某些情況下,投資者可能涉及額外風險。

若閣下對其中任何資料有疑問,謹請與閣下的財務顧問聯絡。

只適用於UCITS基金: 此外,投資者權利概要可從這裡獲得。根據 UCITS 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 UCITS 指令第 93a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

只適用於AIFMD基金:此外,投資者權利摘要可從這裡獲得。根據 AIFMD 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 AIFMD指令第 32a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

為避免疑問,如果您決定投資,即代表您將購買本基金的單位/股份,並不是直接投資於本基金的相關資產。

本文件由富蘭克林鄧普頓投資(亞洲)有限公司發行,並未為香港證監會所審閱。

除非另有註明,所有資料截至上述日期。資料來源:富蘭克林鄧普頓。

CFA® 及Chartered Financial Analyst®為特許金融分析師協會擁有的商標。