跳转到文章内容

While emerging market (EM) bonds have exhibited elevated volatility in recent years due to the after-effects of COVID-19 and global central bank tightening, EM corporate bonds have been a bright spot in the fixed-income asset class. Risk-adjusted returns for EM corporates compare favorably to other fixed-income investments (Exhibit 1). There are fundamental reasons for EM corporates’ recent performance, as well as some structural challenges to consider when lending to companies in developing markets.

Exhibit 1: EM Corporates Resilient in the Face of Headwinds—5-Year Risk/Reward Comparison

Source: Bloomberg, JPMorgan. As of September 29, 2023. US High Yield is represented by the Bloomberg US Corporate High-Yield Index; EM Frontier is represented by the J.P. Morgan Next Generation Markets (NEXGEM) Index; EM Corporate is represented by the J.P. Morgan Corporate Emerging Markets Bond Index (CEMBI); EM Local is represented by the J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Index; US Credit is represented by the Bloomberg US Credit Index; US Aggregate is represented by the Bloomberg US Aggregate Index. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

Sources of resilience

Why have EM corporates been able to outperform among increased funding costs and messy global growth? Rather than being a levered version of their respective sovereigns, corporate debt issuers in EM countries have adapted over time to be able to weather political and economic stress. Given that their macroeconomic backdrops can be more uncertain than in the US, EM companies often run their balance sheets with less debt than their developed market (DM) peers (Exhibit 2). Also, EM indices contain significant exposure to companies with access to hard currency revenues. For reasons like these, even corporates in countries with challenged sovereign fundamentals such as Argentina and Turkey have generated resilient returns in recent years.

Exhibit 2: EM Credit Leverage Stands Out Among the Rest

Source: JPMorgan. As of June 30, 2023. EM: Emerging Markets; DM: Developed Markets; IG: Investment-Grade; HY: High-Yield.

Structural deficiencies

For EM bond investors, the defensive characteristics of corporate bonds can be very attractive; however, one large difference exists between DM and EM credit: the ability for bondholders to use structure to protect downside credit risk. For both DM and EM investment-grade debt, structure does not often come into play given the typical use of unsecured debt with limited covenants. But when delving into the below-investment-grade space, tools typically used by DM creditors to limit downside (e.g., security, structural seniority and covenants) are more difficult to harness in EM given less developed legal and regulatory environments. And using domestic bankruptcy systems to improve recoveries can be much more challenging for EM, as some investors in insolvent companies in bellwether EM countries such as Brazil and Mexico have, to their dismay, discovered.

Working around structure limits

Despite the aforementioned constraints, EM countries are able to offer a robust high-yield investment universe consisting of newly issued below-investment-grade-rated credits as well as fallen angels. The market over time has adjusted to concerns about credit downside by being more conservative with underwriting across countries, sectors and leverage levels, as well as by de-emphasizing market participants (e.g., private equity) who would typically use structure-aided financial engineering to boost returns. The result across the EM high-yield corporate market is that recoveries in the event of bond defaults are remarkably similar to US high-yield recoveries despite the potential difficulty in EM countries of legally collecting on defaulted debts (Exhibit 3). At Western Asset, we use our deep sovereign research capabilities to understand country-level economic trends and political developments in seeking to limit exposure to credits with the potential for low recoveries. We also emphasize credit characteristics unique to EM corporates that can influence default risk such as uncertain regulatory frameworks and mismatches between hard currency debt and domestic revenues.

Exhibit 3: EM Recovery Rates Compare Favorably to US High-Yield

Source: JPMorgan, Moody’s. *Global EM ex-Russia. Data refers to universes of bonds, not indexes. “Recovery rate” is a term used in credit to describe the bond price of an issuer post-default and is measured in “cents on the dollar” or percentage of par.  It describes the severity of the default and the loss relative to par. As of December 31, 2022. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

Implications for EM private credit

Private credit has been a popular allocation for institutional investors in recent years given high floating-rate yields and optically stable returns. While extending private credit into EM could be an appealing target for investors, we would note that the structural advantages of private credit (e.g., liens, covenants, ability to foreclose) do not necessarily apply to EM investments, for the reasons cited earlier. As a result, we do not expect a similar shift in EM economies from public markets to private markets like what is currently being observed in the US below-investment-grade market. We do expect to see some private transactions marketed for higher-quality EM issuers and/or credits with unique characteristics such as offshore export revenues that could lend themselves to structuring. However, in general, Western Asset continues to believe in the benefits of public market EM corporate exposure, such as disclosure, price discovery and liquidity.



Copyright ©2025 富蘭克林鄧普頓。版權所有。

本文件僅供一般參考。本文件不應被視作個人投資建議或買賣或持有任何基金股份或證券的要約或招攬。有關本文所提及的任何證券的資料並不足以用作制定投資決策。投資涉及風險。投資價值可升或跌,過往業績不代表或不保證將來的表現。投資收益是以資產淨值計算,已考慮股息再投資及資本增長或損失。投資收益以所示貨幣計價,該等貨幣可能是美元/港元以外的貨幣(「外幣」)。因此,以美元/港元交易的投資者需承受美元/港元與外幣之間匯率波動的風險。投資者應仔細閱讀銷售文件,以獲取進一步資料,包括風險因素。

本文件所載的數據、評論、意見、預測及其他資料如有更改恕不另行通知。不保證投資產品目標將會實現,亦不保證所示預測將會實現。表現亦可能受貨幣波動影響。流動性下降或會對資產價格產生不利影響。貨幣波動可能會影響海外投資的價值。如果投資產品投資於新興市場,風險可能高於投資於已發展市場。如果投資產品投資於衍生工具,則需承擔特定風險,這可能會增加投資產品承受的風險水平。如果投資產品投資於特定行業或地區,回報的波動程度可能高於更多元化的投資產品投資。富蘭克林鄧普頓不就使用本文件或其所載的任何評論、意見或估計而導致的任何直接或間接後果性損失承擔任何責任。在未得到富蘭克林鄧普頓的事先書面同意下,不得以任何方式複製、派發或發表本文件。

名稱中包含「(已對沖)」的任何股份類別將嘗試對沖本基金基礎貨幣與股份類別計值貨幣之間的貨幣風險,但不保證可以成功對沖。在某些情況下,投資者可能涉及額外風險。

若閣下對其中任何資料有疑問,謹請與閣下的財務顧問聯絡。

只適用於UCITS基金: 此外,投資者權利概要可從這裡獲得。根據 UCITS 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 UCITS 指令第 93a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

只適用於AIFMD基金:此外,投資者權利摘要可從這裡獲得。根據 AIFMD 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 AIFMD指令第 32a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

為避免疑問,如果您決定投資,即代表您將購買本基金的單位/股份,並不是直接投資於本基金的相關資產。

本文件由富蘭克林鄧普頓投資(亞洲)有限公司發行,並未為香港證監會所審閱。

除非另有註明,所有資料截至上述日期。資料來源:富蘭克林鄧普頓。

CFA® 及Chartered Financial Analyst®為特許金融分析師協會擁有的商標。