跳转到文章内容

Small cap stays in the black

The Russell 2000 Index rose 5.2% in 2Q23. After posting negative results in April and May, small caps rebounded in June. Most of the action, however, took place in the upper echelons of market capitalization. The Russell 1000 Index gained 8.6%, and the mega-cap Russell Top 50 was up 13.2%. Moreover, the tech-laden Nasdaq Composite, home to market cap behemoths such as Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, and Nvidia, advanced 13.2%. So whilst the 2Q23 results were somewhat saw-toothed—the Russell Midcap Index was up 4.8%—returns were tightly concentrated at the very top of the market.

Bigger Worked Best in 2Q23

2Q23 Returns for the Russell Top 50, Russell 1000, and Russell 2000 Indexes

Source: Russell Investments. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This pattern mostly held for the year-to-date period ended 6/30/23 as well. For 2023’s first half, the Russell 2000 was up 8.1%, while the Russell 1000 increased 16.7%, the Russell Top 50 rose 27.8%, and the Nasdaq advanced 32.3%. Interestingly, the year began with an advantage for small cap, which unfortunately only lasted until Groundhog Day, this year’s high for the small-cap index. At the end of January, the Russell 2000 was 300 basis points ahead of its large-cap counterpart; it finished June 859 basis points behind it year to date.

Although returns were lower, large-cap outperformance could also be seen among non-U.S. stocks, with the important difference that the spread for both 2Q23 and the year-to-date period was much narrower. For 2Q23, the MSCI ACWI Small Cap ex USA Index rose 2.0% while the MSCI ACWI ex USA Large Cap Index was up 2.7%; for the year-to-date period ended 6/30/23, the international small cap index advanced 6.8% and the international large cap index increased 9.8%.

Notable sector spreads

Two factors drove the reversal in leadership between U.S. small and large cap stocks. Small caps bore the brunt of the damage from the banking crisis, which had some of its most adverse effects on the share prices of smaller regional players. Unsurprisingly, then, banks were the top-detracting industry in the Russell 2000 for both 2Q23 and the year’s first half.

2Q23 Highest Contribution by Sector for the Russell 2000 and Russell 1000 Indexes

As of 6/30/23

Source: Russell Investments. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Information Technology—which accounts for more than 25% of the large-cap index—dominated performance within the Russell 1000, followed by notable contributions from Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Health Care led within small cap, followed by Industrials and Information Technology. However, none of these three small-cap sectors carries anything close to the weight of Tech in the Russell 1000, nor did their respective contributions approach the dominance technology stocks demonstrated within large cap.

The small-cap story

We think it’s important to remember that the Russell 2000 remained in a bear market at the end of June, despite positive returns for 2Q23 and the first half of 2023. The small-cap index was down -20.8% from its high on 11/8/21 through 6/30/23. When it comes to small cap, many investors would appear to agree with the bond market about the uncertain state of the U.S. economy.

This lack of attention to small caps can be seen in other ways. Inflation is falling, and the Fed paused, yet neither development did anything to improve small-cap performance on an absolute or relative basis. Both rising and falling inflation have historically been accompanied by strong absolute and relative performance for small cap—a record that goes back almost a century to the 1930s—but the Russell 2000 underperformed during the rise and subsequent drop in inflation from its 9.1% high in June 2022 to 4.0% at the end of May 2023.

Consistent with the notion that economic apprehensiveness is keeping investors away from many small-cap stocks were the relatively underwhelming results for more economically sensitive cyclical stocks within the Russell 2000, which significantly trailed their defensive siblings in 2Q23. Moreover, the Russell 2000 Value Index trailed the Russell 2000 Growth Index for both 2Q23 (+3.2% versus +7.1%) and 2023’s first half (+2.5% versus +13.6%), eroding much of its long-term relative performance edge.

Where are we now?

Yet we are resolutely confident about the long-term prospects for our chosen asset class. Thanks to a significant amount of multiple compression over the last several months, valuations still look highly favorable for small cap on both an absolute basis and relative to large cap, where they remain close to a 20-year low based on enterprise value over earnings before interest & taxes (“EV/EBIT”).

Relative Valuations for Small Caps vs. Large Caps Remain Near Their Lowest in 20 Years

Russell 2000 vs. Russell 1000 Median LTM EV/EBIT* (ex. Negative EBIT Companies)
From 6/30/03 through 6/30/23

Source: Russell Investments. *Last twelve months Enterprise Value/Earnings Before Interest and Taxes. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Similarly, the Russell 2000 Value finished June much more attractively valued than the Russell 2000 Growth, based on the same EV/EBIT metric.

Finally, small-cap active management is having a moment. Using the Morningstar Small Blend1 Category as our proxy, we found that actively managed funds had a performance advantage over the Russell 2000 for the one- (+12.5% versus +12.3%), three- (+14.1% versus +10.8%), and five-year periods (+5.2% versus +4.2%) ended 6/30/23, while finishing essentially even for the 10-year period (+8.3% versus + 8.3%) ended 6/30/23. When we excluded index funds and included only the oldest share class of a fund within a category, 107 out of 173 funds outperformed the Russell 2000 for the one-year period; 145 out of 166 funds outpaced the small-cap index for the three-year period; 120 out of 156 funds did so for the five-year period; and 76 out of 130 funds beat the Russell 2000 for the 10-year period—all ended 6/30/23.

Our outlook

January and June were the only months with positive small-cap returns so far in 2023. Sandwiched in between were four straight down months for the Russell 2000. Ever alert to historical patterns, we looked at previous four-month negative return periods to see what shape performance took over the subsequent one-, three-, and five-year spans. What we found was very encouraging, with each period coming in well above the one-, three-, and five-year monthly rolling averages for the Russell 2000 since inception.

Since the inception of the index on 12/31/78, small cap has experienced four consecutive months of negative performance nine times. For the eight periods for which we have data, subsequent one-year returns averaged 24.7%; subsequent three-year returns averaged 21.0%; and subsequent five-year returns averaged 16.8%.

Small Caps Shine Following Four Consecutive Months with Negative Returns

Russell 2000 Average Returns Following Four Consecutive Months with Negative Returns Since Inception (12/31/78)

Source: Russell Investments. *Last twelve months Enterprise Value/Earnings Before Interest and Taxes. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

We see an array of potential triggers that would jumpstart small-cap performance in the coming months. First, a soft landing looks more and more likely, and a recession—specifically the kind of deep and potentially lengthy contraction many have been anticipating since late 2021—looks less and less likely.

We have already seen promising developments that suggest a nascently robust economy: durable goods orders rose for the fourth consecutive month in June—and hit a record high for nondefense capital goods (excluding aircraft or core capital goods, a proxy for business equipment investment)—while homebuilding rose by 21.7% in May, a record monthly surge that also defied expectations for a slowdown.

Even more important in our view is the ongoing sense of cautious optimism we have been hearing from many management teams—which was reflected by generally solid earnings for many holdings for the second quarter. All of this is consistent with our contention that small caps are due—perhaps overdue—for a breakout. We have shown the data which examines how strong and lasting a rebound small caps have historically enjoyed after low annualized three- and five-year periods.

Amid the difficulties of bear markets and periods of economic uncertainty, we think it’s crucial to remind investors of the opportunity to build their small-cap allocation at attractively low prices. History shows the rewards that have accrued to investors who had the necessary patience and discipline to stay invested during periods of sluggish or negative performance. We continue to see the currently unsettled period as an opportune time to invest in select small caps for the long run.



Copyright ©2025 富蘭克林鄧普頓。版權所有。

本文件僅供一般參考。本文件不應被視作個人投資建議或買賣或持有任何基金股份或證券的要約或招攬。有關本文所提及的任何證券的資料並不足以用作制定投資決策。投資涉及風險。投資價值可升或跌,過往業績不代表或不保證將來的表現。投資收益是以資產淨值計算,已考慮股息再投資及資本增長或損失。投資收益以所示貨幣計價,該等貨幣可能是美元/港元以外的貨幣(「外幣」)。因此,以美元/港元交易的投資者需承受美元/港元與外幣之間匯率波動的風險。投資者應仔細閱讀銷售文件,以獲取進一步資料,包括風險因素。

本文件所載的數據、評論、意見、預測及其他資料如有更改恕不另行通知。不保證投資產品目標將會實現,亦不保證所示預測將會實現。表現亦可能受貨幣波動影響。流動性下降或會對資產價格產生不利影響。貨幣波動可能會影響海外投資的價值。如果投資產品投資於新興市場,風險可能高於投資於已發展市場。如果投資產品投資於衍生工具,則需承擔特定風險,這可能會增加投資產品承受的風險水平。如果投資產品投資於特定行業或地區,回報的波動程度可能高於更多元化的投資產品投資。富蘭克林鄧普頓不就使用本文件或其所載的任何評論、意見或估計而導致的任何直接或間接後果性損失承擔任何責任。在未得到富蘭克林鄧普頓的事先書面同意下,不得以任何方式複製、派發或發表本文件。

名稱中包含「(已對沖)」的任何股份類別將嘗試對沖本基金基礎貨幣與股份類別計值貨幣之間的貨幣風險,但不保證可以成功對沖。在某些情況下,投資者可能涉及額外風險。

若閣下對其中任何資料有疑問,謹請與閣下的財務顧問聯絡。

只適用於UCITS基金: 此外,投資者權利概要可從這裡獲得。根據 UCITS 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 UCITS 指令第 93a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

只適用於AIFMD基金:此外,投資者權利摘要可從這裡獲得。根據 AIFMD 指令,基金/子基金被通知在不同地區進行營銷。 基金/子基金可以使用 AIFMD指令第 32a 條中包含的程序隨時終止任何股份類別和/或子基金的此類通知。

為避免疑問,如果您決定投資,即代表您將購買本基金的單位/股份,並不是直接投資於本基金的相關資產。

本文件由富蘭克林鄧普頓投資(亞洲)有限公司發行,並未為香港證監會所審閱。

除非另有註明,所有資料截至上述日期。資料來源:富蘭克林鄧普頓。

CFA® 及Chartered Financial Analyst®為特許金融分析師協會擁有的商標。