Skip to content

Emerging markets (EM) have benefited from a meaningful shift in sentiment over recent weeks. The dominant macro catalyst has been the prospect of a US-Iran peace agreement and the expected reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices have retraced more than 30% from their wartime peak. At the same time, US equities and credit spreads have largely priced in a favorable geopolitical outcome.

For EM investors, the peace dividend is clearly positive. Lower oil prices reduce pressure on current accounts, fiscal subsidies and consumer purchasing power across many oil-importing economies. They also ease some of the immediate pressure on central banks that had been forced to respond to the inflationary consequences of higher energy prices. The risk rally has been particularly helpful for high-yield and frontier market sovereigns, where spreads had widened during the earlier phase of the conflict.

That said, one should be careful about extrapolating the market reaction too far. There is an important distinction between a financial market repricing and a real economy normalization. Markets can quickly discount a peace agreement, but physical trade flows, inventories and supply chains take longer to repair. A reopening of the Strait of Hormuz would be a major step forward, but shipping companies, insurers and commodity traders are unlikely to immediately return to pre-conflict operating behavior. Energy inventories also need time to rebuild, and disrupted regional infrastructure, including gas-related facilities, may take time to fully recover. That matters most for inflation.

Spot oil prices have fallen, but the earlier shock has not yet fully passed through the data. Higher freight costs, disrupted shipping patterns, lower inventories and prior fuel-price increases are still likely to affect consumer prices with a lag. The impact will vary by country, but oil-importing EM regions in Asia and parts of Europe remain particularly exposed. Food, transport, electricity and administered prices often adjust gradually, and governments may also need to recalibrate subsidies or regulated prices after the fact.

As a result, we do not think we are yet at a clean disinflation inflection point. Our base case is that inflation data in several EM regions may continue to move higher over the next three to six months before stabilizing. More favorable base effects should eventually help the disinflation process, but that is more likely to become visible next year than immediately.

Rates markets are already reflecting this tension. US Treasury yields remain elevated despite stronger risk sentiment, partly because markets are still focused on fiscal concerns, supply and sticky inflation. Across various EM regions, local rates have repriced higher as central banks account for higher expected inflation and, in some cases, the need to defend currencies. Several EM central banks have adopted a more hawkish tone, and some have already tightened policy to preserve credibility.

For hard-currency EM debt, valuations are no longer as compelling as they were earlier in the shock. Spreads have tightened, frontier market bonds have performed well and the market overall has already priced a meaningful improvement in the geopolitical backdrop. The EM asset class still offers attractive carry, but future returns are likely to depend more on security selection and country fundamentals than broad beta.

Exhibit 1: EM Inflation—Headline and Core Consumer Prices

Source: National statistical agencies, J.P. Morgan. As of June 26, 2026. Shaded area is J.P. Morgan forecast.

Local markets may offer a more balanced opportunity set. We expect EM currencies to remain broadly range-bound versus the US dollar rather than enter a sustained appreciation trend. The dollar has not broken decisively lower, and US rates remain a constraint. However, many EM regions still offer attractive nominal and real yields. If volatility continues to decline and geopolitical risk recedes, carry trades should return to the forefront.

Overall, our view is that the backdrop for EM is constructive, but not without risk. The sector has strong technical support from limited issuance and continued inflows, while lower oil prices reduce an important macro headwind. But the market may be moving faster than the real economy. Until inflation data confirms a turn and trade flows normalize more fully, we would favor carry, selectivity and countries with credible policy frameworks over simply chasing the relief rally.



Copyright ©2025. Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.

This document is intended to be of general interest only. This document should not be construed as individual investment advice or offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any shares of fund. The information provided for any individual security mentioned is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investments involves risks. Value of investments may go up as well as down and past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. The investment returns are calculated on NAV to NAV basis, taking into account of reinvestments and capital gain or loss. The investment returns are denominated in stated currency, which may be a foreign currency other than USD and HKD (“other foreign currency”). US/HK dollar-based investors are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the US/HK dollar / other foreign currency exchange rate. Please refer to the offering documents for further details, including the risk factors.

The data, comments, opinions, estimates and other information contained herein may be subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that an investment product will meet its objective and any forecasts expressed will be realized. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where an investment product invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where an investment product invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the investment product. Where an investment product invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified investment product. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from use of this document or any comment, opinion or estimate herein. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any share class with “(Hedged)” in its name will attempt to hedge the currency risk between the base currency of the Fund and the currency of the share class, although there can be no guarantee that it will be successful in doing so. In some cases, investors may be subject to additional risks.

Please contact your financial advisor if you are in doubt of any information contained herein.

For UCITS funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the UCITS Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.

For AIFMD funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the AIFMD Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 32a of the AIFMD Directive.

For the avoidance of doubt, if you make a decision to invest, you will be buying units/shares in the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) and will not be investing directly in the underlying assets of the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s).

This document is issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Unless stated otherwise, all information is as of the date stated above. Source: Franklin Templeton.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.