Skip to content

Taiwan's dominance in chip manufacturing makes it a concentrated, high-conviction bet on artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure demand—the so-called "foundational" trade. But that raises an uncomfortable question: What happens if the world starts dialing back on capital expenditure (capex)?

It's a fair concern. AI capex has been staggering, and it’s no wonder investors are asking whether the returns will match the outlay—especially with a fresh round of headlines questioning AI's risks adding to the unease. Elevated US Treasury yields have restored a traditional discipline to markets: Capital has a cost, and distant earnings are worth less today.

While the United States remains the center of gravity for AI model development, Taiwan is focused on advanced chip fabrication, packaging and the supplier ecosystem that turns AI ambitions into physical capacity. And two of the biggest questions around the Taiwan investment story are: whether AI outcomes are uncertain (they are), and whether AI infrastructure demand is uncertain (less so).

Even as AI skepticism has intensified, revenue growth has accelerated for Taiwan's integrated-circuit (IC) industry, which is the ecosystem that makes the tiny electronic “brains” inside computers, smartphones, cars, data centers and AI systems. This is a signal worth paying attention to, since uncertainty over which AI winners might ultimately emerge has not dented demand for the companies enabling the infrastructure beneath them.

After Taiwan’s IC industry experienced a 10% revenue contraction in 2023, its global semiconductor revenues rebounded ~22% in 2024, nearly 23% in 2025, and are projected by the Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Association to grow about 41% in 2026.1

Importantly, demand visibility extends well beyond the next few quarters. One indication of that longer demand horizon comes from Taiwan’s largest semiconductor manufacturer, which has said that customer engagement for increasingly complex leading-edge technologies now begins at least two to three years in advance, providing visibility into customers’ multi-year product and production plans.2

Taiwan IC Revenues Rebound Strongly After 2023 Downturn

Taiwan Integrated Circuit Revenue Growth
2020 to 2026E

Note: Revenue growth pertains to Taiwan worldwide semiconductor revenue growth. Source: Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Association. There is no assurance that any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized.

Taiwan's Next Exciting Chapter May Happen Outside the Fabs

A large export boom doesn't stay confined to exports indefinitely. Revenues become capex, investment creates jobs, profits support wages and rising income supports consumption. Taiwan’s macroeconomic data is showing early signs that the AI export boom may be filtering into the domestic economy. Net exports remained the dominant contributor to growth in the second quarter, but private consumption and capital investment also made meaningful contributions—a notable change from three years ago when investment was contracting. Record employee earnings and elevated household savings provide additional potential fuel for domestic demand.

The first chapter of Taiwan's AI story was what it exported; the second may be what profits for those exports generate domestically.

Real GDP Growth and Inflation Forecasts

Source: Bloomberg Consensus. There is no assurance any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com.

Higher Treasury Yields Should Change What Investors Demand

Higher rates compress multiples for growth priced years out. But they also sharpen the AI debate, forcing markets to separate companies promising future profits from those already generating earnings from infrastructure demand. After seeing nearly a 34% earnings contraction three years ago, Taiwan’s corporate earnings have rebounded strongly, and that momentum is expected to accelerate this year. Consensus estimates currently call for earnings per share (EPS) to grow more than 50% in 2026.3

Wait for the Dip—or Allocate Through It?

Foreign investor demand for Taiwan dampened during June's tech selloff, but then bounced back with strong third quarter inflows. That pattern shows up in the broader ETF flow data. US-listed international equity net inflows fell by more than half in the second quarter, to just under US$54 billion from US$113.5 billion in the first quarter.4 Flows rebounded to about US$28.1 billion in July and held at a still-strong US$23.4 billion in August, well above the Q2 monthly average.5

Country-level ETF flows zoom in on this same story. South Korea saw about US$1.3 billion in Q2 outflows before reversing to gather US$5.04 billion in July and staying positive at US$530 million in August. Taiwan's flows, while positive, softened over spring and early summer before reaccelerating in July and August. In fact, August alone nearly matched Taiwan's entire Q2 total, and quarter-to-date inflows of US$1.2 billion are already more than 60% ahead of the full second quarter.6

To be sure, this swing isn't a trading signal—it just shows how fast sentiment can move even when the industrial position hasn't. Real risks remain: cyclical semiconductor demand, a tech-heavy equity market, cross-strait tensions, rate pressure on valuations, and the chance that AI capex genuinely does retrench.

Waiting for every uncertainty to find resolution, however, also has its own cost: Markets may already have repriced the resolution by the time it arrives. Uncertainty exists. That much is clear. The better question is whether the reason for owning Taiwan has deteriorated. In our view, it hasn't.

Many US investors already own heavy AI exposure through mega-caps. Taiwan as an AI play can be viewed as closer to the physical build-out than the model layer.

That also argues for looking beyond any single chipmaker. Technology represents a large share of Taiwan’s broad equity market, creating concentration risk, but the opportunity set extends well beyond its biggest companies. Taiwan is home to a deep ecosystem spanning chip design and manufacturing, advanced packaging and testing, electronics assembly, networking and power-management technologies. Recent gains have also extended across a wide range of technology companies, suggesting the AI hardware cycle is reaching more broadly through the corporate ecosystem.

The question may no longer be whether investors have missed Taiwan's AI boom. It may be whether they're overlooking what comes after it.



This document is intended to be of general interest only. This document should not be construed as individual investment advice or offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any shares of fund. The information provided for any individual security mentioned is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investments involves risks. Value of investments may go up as well as down and past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. The investment returns are calculated on NAV to NAV basis, taking into account of reinvestments and capital gain or loss. The investment returns are denominated in stated currency, which may be a foreign currency other than USD and HKD (“other foreign currency”). US/HK dollar-based investors are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the US/HK dollar / other foreign currency exchange rate. Please refer to the offering documents for further details, including the risk factors.

The data, comments, opinions, estimates and other information contained herein may be subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that an investment product will meet its objective and any forecasts expressed will be realized. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where an investment product invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where an investment product invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the investment product. Where an investment product invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified investment product. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from use of this document or any comment, opinion or estimate herein. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any share class with “(Hedged)” in its name will attempt to hedge the currency risk between the base currency of the Fund and the currency of the share class, although there can be no guarantee that it will be successful in doing so. In some cases, investors may be subject to additional risks.

Please contact your financial advisor if you are in doubt of any information contained herein.

For UCITS funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the UCITS Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.

For AIFMD funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the AIFMD Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 32a of the AIFMD Directive.

For the avoidance of doubt, if you make a decision to invest, you will be buying units/shares in the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) and will not be investing directly in the underlying assets of the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s).

This document is issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Unless stated otherwise, all information is as of the date stated above. Source: Franklin Templeton.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.