Skip to content

Key takeaways

  • Iran-related tensions are raising the risk of energy/commodity supply disruptions, pushing up transport and input costs globally.
  • Infrastructure offers built-in inflation defense, with regulatory frameworks and long-term contracts often allowing cost (and inflation) pass-through, supporting cash flows even if valuations face near-term rate pressure.
  • Resilience varies by asset type, but the toolkit is broad: utilities in North America and Europe, pipelines and toll roads are positioned to withstand and grow through commodity-driven shocks.

Infrastructure’s cash flow characteristics provide inflation protection

The escalation of military tensions with Iran has led to supply disruptions across key energy and commodity markets, including oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and other critical resources moving through the Middle East. This has contributed to renewed inflation pressures globally as higher energy, transport and input costs flow through supply chains.

In this environment, infrastructure assets continue to be resilient because many operate under regulatory frameworks or long-term contractual structures that allow inflation and cost increases to be passed through to end users over time. As a result, while higher interest rates and macro volatility may create short-term valuation pressure, the underlying cash flow characteristics of infrastructure assets provide inflation protection during periods of geopolitical-driven commodity shocks.

North American utilities

We are seeing increased global commodity price volatility driven by geopolitical tensions, which is already placing upward pressure on power costs in some international markets and highlighting utilities’ exposure to fuel prices. While US natural gas prices have remained relatively stable to date, we believe a sustained increase would place upward pressure on electricity costs and affordability.

North American utilities are, however, largely insulated through cost-of-service regulation, which allows fuel and other operating costs to be recovered through customer tariffs. While higher input costs can create short-term pressure, the regulatory framework provides mechanisms for recovery, and allowed returns may adjust over time as capital market conditions change.

Our focus remains on utilities operating in constructive jurisdictions, where regulatory support and affordability outcomes may be better balanced, as identified through our detailed bottom-up investment process.

European utilities

Elevated oil and gas prices linked to Middle East tensions are increasing energy costs across Europe and adding to inflation pressures. In response, European governments are rolling out subsidies and targeted support measures to ease affordability pressures for households and industry, while sustaining energy demand for utilities. At the European Union (EU) level, policymakers are considering additional actions such as reducing energy taxes and subsidizing gas-fired generation, with a dual focus on preserving industrial competitiveness and advancing energy independence.

For regulated utilities operating within frameworks where returns on the regulated asset base are periodically reset, higher inflation and funding costs can be reflected in future tariffs. While there may be a lag before adjustments occur, regulatory structures typically allow inflation to be passed through to customers over time, helping preserve long-term asset value even in periods of energy-driven inflation. As such, we believe there is dual protection in the current environment; policy support underpins demand, while regulatory frameworks allow inflation to be reflected in pricing over time, supporting earnings resilience even if inflation persists.

North American pipelines

Energy infrastructure may be one of the more direct beneficiaries of current geopolitical disruptions. Higher oil and gas prices driven by supply uncertainty in the Middle East will likely trigger major importing countries to diversify their sources of energy. Following the 2022 Russia/Ukraine conflict, US LNG exports to Europe increased significantly as Europe looked to diversify away from Russian energy reliance as part of its REPowerEU initiative. In the current environment, we would expect Asian importing countries such as Japan and Korea to increasingly look to North American sources of oil and gas to reduce their reliance on the Middle East. In that context, projects such as LNG Canada Phase II and the Trans Mountain Expansion project have enhanced business cases. We would expect these demand-pull infrastructure projects, combined with a higher netback (profitability) environment for producers, to stimulate additional production activity across North America. This could translate to higher volumes handled by energy infrastructure assets such as pipelines, processing facilities and storage.

Regarding inflation, many pipeline assets operate under cost-of-service structures or long-term take-or-pay contracts with inflation escalators, providing a degree of protection from rising costs while benefiting from stronger volumes if global supply chains shift toward more stable producing regions.

Toll roads

The effects of recent oil price volatility driven by the conflict in Iran has a less pronounced impact on toll roads due to the mechanisms by which inflation is passed through for those assets. Many concession agreements allow tolls to increase in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or have predefined escalation mechanisms that capture the impact of higher energy prices, which are a component of this inflation. With regards to demand impacts, higher fuel prices may temporarily dampen discretionary travel. However, this typically represents the smallest segment of an urban toll road’s revenues at only 15%–30%, with business and freight travel less sensitive to cost pressures. Ultimately, revenue resilience remains strong, in our view, as inflation-linked pricing structures and fixed cost bases enable operators to offset macroeconomic headwinds and protect margins over time.

Airports

Airports are exposed to the current environment through higher aviation fuel costs and potential short-term impacts on travel demand (including reduced travel to regions affected by the conflict), particularly amid elevated cost of living pressures and oil price volatility linked to Iran. However, historically, the long-term trend of air travel demand has proven inelastic to both cost of living pressures and economic and price shocks (with the exception of COVID-19). Many airport revenue streams are either regulated or contractually linked to inflation, supporting resilience in the current inflationary backdrop. Aeronautical charges are often set using CPI-linked formulas, while commercial revenues such as retail, parking and property leases can adjust with passenger spending and pricing power. This combination could provide a mechanism to gradually pass inflation through to airport revenues despite near-term volatility in passenger volumes driven by higher fuel costs.

Contracted renewables

Renewable energy assets primarily operate under long-term fixed-price power purchase agreements (PPAs), which incorporate inflation expectations as part of the pricing assumptions at the outset. These assets are structurally less exposed to short-term volatility in fossil-fuel prices. While the agreements do not typically contain inflation pass-through mechanisms, sustained inflation-driven increases in oil and gas prices ultimately improve the relative competitiveness of renewable energy, resulting in increased demand for new projects and the potential for improved project returns.



Copyright ©2025. Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.

This document is intended to be of general interest only. This document should not be construed as individual investment advice or offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any shares of fund. The information provided for any individual security mentioned is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investments involves risks. Value of investments may go up as well as down and past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. The investment returns are calculated on NAV to NAV basis, taking into account of reinvestments and capital gain or loss. The investment returns are denominated in stated currency, which may be a foreign currency other than USD and HKD (“other foreign currency”). US/HK dollar-based investors are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the US/HK dollar / other foreign currency exchange rate. Please refer to the offering documents for further details, including the risk factors.

The data, comments, opinions, estimates and other information contained herein may be subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that an investment product will meet its objective and any forecasts expressed will be realized. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where an investment product invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where an investment product invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the investment product. Where an investment product invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified investment product. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from use of this document or any comment, opinion or estimate herein. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any share class with “(Hedged)” in its name will attempt to hedge the currency risk between the base currency of the Fund and the currency of the share class, although there can be no guarantee that it will be successful in doing so. In some cases, investors may be subject to additional risks.

Please contact your financial advisor if you are in doubt of any information contained herein.

For UCITS funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the UCITS Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.

For AIFMD funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the AIFMD Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 32a of the AIFMD Directive.

For the avoidance of doubt, if you make a decision to invest, you will be buying units/shares in the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) and will not be investing directly in the underlying assets of the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s).

This document is issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Unless stated otherwise, all information is as of the date stated above. Source: Franklin Templeton.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.