Skip to content

Commercial real estate (CRE) debt is navigating a challenging environment, impacted by steeply rising interest rates, falling property valuations, and severe issues in the office sector. This situation is exacerbated by a looming maturity wall of low-interest loans due to refinance in late 2024 and 2025, potentially causing significant distress for both borrowers and highly leveraged lenders.

When the levee breaks—The maturity wall

There is a wall of transitional real estate debt set to mature over the next two years (Exhibit 1). Data firm Trepp estimates that $1.2 trillion in CRE loans will reach maturity in 2024-25, with nearly another $1.8 trillion to follow in 2026-2028.

Exhibit 1. Wall of Maturities

Source: Trepp, Q4 2023. *Other: Primarily comprised of multifamily lending by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This could also include finance companies (private debt funds, REITs, CLOs, etc.), pension funds, government or other sources.

Much of this debt was financed in 2021 after COVID, and at very low interest rates (2021 was one of the most prolific origination periods in recent history). A large portion of these loans were financed by banks—and to the office sector. When these loans come due many will be distressed. Borrowers will be unable to service the debt at the higher base rates. Lenders will come under pressure as defaults mount.

Maturity dates are the day of reckoning. When interest rates were consistently trending lower, as they were for 40-plus years, most borrowers simply refinanced—often with a better rate and longer term. Today, because financing costs have doubled or tripled since 2021 (a phenomenon that generally hasn’t been seen since the 1970s), this will be unlikely. Most properties have declined in value. Owners will be hard pressed to find originators willing to lend.  

The lenders embargo

Given the maturity wall, most industry lenders—regional banks, mREITS, and private debt providers—are no longer offering capital. This is a major headwind for CRE. The loan market has ground to a halt. In the same way that rising interest rates pressure borrowers, lenders are also feeling the squeeze. The relationship between CRE lending and rates is paradoxical. It is a double-edged sword. While higher base rates provide lenders higher income initially, they simultaneously weaken borrowers. When loans reach maturity, it may be difficult for many borrowers to pay back the debt. This obviously hurts lenders, resulting in more defaults, write-downs, and losses.

Adding insult to injury, many mid-market lenders have high levels of exposure to the very challenged office sector. Consider the regional banking industry. Nearly 70% of all outstanding middle market CRE debt is held at small and regional banks (Exhibit 2). Roughly 30% of their books are loans to office.

Exhibit 2. Regional Banks Account for Majority of Outstanding CRE Debt

Source: Federal Reserve H.8 reported U.S. bank CRE holdings. Data is non-seasonally adjusted and as of October 29, 2023.

When these and other sector loans mature the banks will face significant balance sheet challenges. Given the Fed’s tightening—coupled with secular trends—everything is worth much less than it was two years ago. In addition, banks must navigate increased capital reserve requirements. The bottom line, banks are not lending because they need to hoard cash. They need to prepare to defend against a wall of potentially broken loans. They are trying to guide to safety bricks falling from the sky.

Opportunity for lenders with dry powder

Two of the most active lenders in the market, regional banks and mREITs, are currently on the sideline. They are saving cash to prepare for the worst as they hope for the best. Direct lenders, apart from a handful of well positioned players, find themselves in similar predicaments in terms of legacy loan issues, handicapped by rising rate issues and office exposure. Probably the last thing many are thinking about is playing offense; they are conserving as much cash as possible.

In contrast, managers with dry powder and limited office exposure on their books are in a great position. They will benefit from a vast and fertile lending landscape, empty of competitors like banks and mREITs. They can be selective in lending to high-quality properties that have already been discounted 20-25%. They can write preferable terms and set higher rates. Good lenders with ample liquidity—and without bad exposures—should thrive.



Copyright ©2025. Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.

This document is intended to be of general interest only. This document should not be construed as individual investment advice or offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any shares of fund. The information provided for any individual security mentioned is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investments involves risks. Value of investments may go up as well as down and past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. The investment returns are calculated on NAV to NAV basis, taking into account of reinvestments and capital gain or loss. The investment returns are denominated in stated currency, which may be a foreign currency other than USD and HKD (“other foreign currency”). US/HK dollar-based investors are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the US/HK dollar / other foreign currency exchange rate. Please refer to the offering documents for further details, including the risk factors.

The data, comments, opinions, estimates and other information contained herein may be subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that an investment product will meet its objective and any forecasts expressed will be realized. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where an investment product invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where an investment product invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the investment product. Where an investment product invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified investment product. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from use of this document or any comment, opinion or estimate herein. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any share class with “(Hedged)” in its name will attempt to hedge the currency risk between the base currency of the Fund and the currency of the share class, although there can be no guarantee that it will be successful in doing so. In some cases, investors may be subject to additional risks.

Please contact your financial advisor if you are in doubt of any information contained herein.

For UCITS funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the UCITS Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.

For AIFMD funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the AIFMD Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 32a of the AIFMD Directive.

For the avoidance of doubt, if you make a decision to invest, you will be buying units/shares in the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) and will not be investing directly in the underlying assets of the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s).

This document is issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Unless stated otherwise, all information is as of the date stated above. Source: Franklin Templeton.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.