Skip to content

CONTRIBUTORS

Kim Catechis

Investment Strategist, 
Franklin Templeton Institute

Karolina Kosinska, CIPM

Analyst
Franklin Templeton Institute

Preview

Since 2022 Europe has weaned itself off Russian piped gas with impressive speed. With energy storage on the horizon, there is a huge opportunity for Europe to now focus those efforts on delivering low-cost clean power, to ensure manufacturing competitiveness and a just transition. Contrary to prevailing perception, renewables remain the cheapest form of electricity in most markets globally. A high-quality electricity grid, low interest rates and the largest consumer market in the world provide Europe a unique opportunity in a fracturing geopolitical landscape.”
Craig CameronPortfolio Manager, Templeton Global Equity Group

Consensus seems to be that European capital markets are unattractive because of structural issues that governments do not seem to be able to address. This paper indicates that there is a combination of necessity, opportunity and urgency that could deliver sustainably low electricity prices in the medium term, and that could be revolutionary.

Key takeaways:

  • A new economic and geopolitical order is shaping up, in which three centers of economic gravity stand out: The United States, China and the European Union. Each one has structural strengths and weaknesses and a different governance system, which ultimately determines policy direction. This new order prioritizes geoeconomic logic over traditional economic logic.
  • In this increasingly geopolitically driven world, the role of energy security is central. For China and Europe, this is a critical vulnerability, which both are striving to address via electrification. Global electricity demand is forecast to grow faster than the rate of gross domestic product (GDP) growth, at least until 2030.
  • This situation leads to a reorganization of economic geography where energy availability and cost are critical. Overall, electrification is not just a technological challenge but also interlocked with policy priorities, economic development and industrial and national security.
  • In Europe, the three main drivers of electrification are climate change, digitalization and geopolitical pressure, which provides urgency. Fortunately, Europe is advanced in its transition to renewable energy and already derives 48%1 of its electricity from renewables, thus enhancing its strategic energy security.
  • There is a realistic route for Europe to develop a resilient, structurally low-cost continental power grid, which could provide a significant boost to productivity, catapulting the region out of the economic mire.
  • The time horizon is 2030 and the signposts include domestic politics, project delivery, new interconnectors and storage infrastructure. Any slippage in the next three years could significantly delay the objective.
  • The best-placed countries today are the Netherlands, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Spain and Germany, because they have advanced the most in renewables and either achieved low-cost electricity or are 3-5 years away. The most challenged is Italy (still 56% gas and only 20% wind and solar2). Poland (power deficit looming amid shutdown of old plants while still 61% dependent on coal, even as renewables soared to 27%3) and France could be leaders or laggards, depending largely on domestic politics. Some, like Sweden,4 are operating multiple regional markets, and Germany could move to two zones, incentivizing investment in interconnectors.
  • Ultimately, the European Union’s (EU’s) wholesale energy market will operate with three pillars:
    • Supply priced off low operating cost and clean energy assets (e.g., renewables, nuclear) which require investment in interconnectors to facilitate the transfer of surplus power to areas that need it.
    • Additional supply priced off long-term contracts (e.g., piped gas, shipped liquefied gas under fixed, regular deliveries/prices).
    • Short-term needs priced off a European spot market (spot purchases of electricity supply or liquified natural gas [LNG] cargoes).
  • The reason for confidence in this scenario is simple: The driver for both defense and electricity is the same: survival in an increasingly Hobbesian world,5 where countries must stand up or be trampled.

Endnotes

  1. Source: European Electricity Review 2025. EMBER. January 23, 2025.
  2. Source: Countries and Regions: Italy. EMBER. Updated October 9, 2024.
  3. Source: Changing course: Poland’s energy in 2023. EMBER. February 7, 2024.
  4. Source: Svenska Kraftnät. Operations and Electricity Markets: “Sweden is divided into four bidding areas from bidding area SE1 in the north to bidding area Malmö SE4 in the south. The price of electricity in each bidding area is determined by supply and demand of electricity and transmission capacity between bidding areas.”
  5. Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher who famously published Leviathan in 1651. He held that the State of Nature is a state of war, a dog-eat-dog world of conflict over limited power and scarce resources. Life for the weak in a Hobbesian world is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.”

 

WHAT ARE THE RISKS?

All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal.

International investments are subject to special risks, including currency fluctuations and social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in emerging markets. Investments in companies in a specific country or region may experience greater volatility than those that are more broadly diversified geographically.

The government’s participation in the economy is still high and, therefore, investments in China will be subject to larger regulatory risk levels compared to many other countries.

There are special risks associated with investments in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, including less liquidity, expropriation, confiscatory taxation, international trade tensions, nationalization, and exchange control regulations and rapid inflation, all of which can negatively impact the fund. Investments in Taiwan could be adversely affected by its political and economic relationship with China.

Companies in the infrastructure industry may be subject to a variety of factors, including high interest costs, high degrees of leverage, effects of economic slowdowns, increased competition, and impact resulting from government and regulatory policies and practices.

The managers’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) strategies may limit the types and number of investments available and, as a result, may forgo favorable market opportunities or underperform strategies that are not subject to such criteria. There is no guarantee that the strategy's ESG directives will be successful or will result in better performance.

Copyright ©2025. Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.

This document is intended to be of general interest only. This document should not be construed as individual investment advice or offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any shares of fund. The information provided for any individual security mentioned is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investments involves risks. Value of investments may go up as well as down and past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. The investment returns are calculated on NAV to NAV basis, taking into account of reinvestments and capital gain or loss. The investment returns are denominated in stated currency, which may be a foreign currency other than USD and HKD (“other foreign currency”). US/HK dollar-based investors are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the US/HK dollar / other foreign currency exchange rate. Please refer to the offering documents for further details, including the risk factors.

The data, comments, opinions, estimates and other information contained herein may be subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that an investment product will meet its objective and any forecasts expressed will be realized. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where an investment product invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where an investment product invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the investment product. Where an investment product invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified investment product. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from use of this document or any comment, opinion or estimate herein. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any share class with “(Hedged)” in its name will attempt to hedge the currency risk between the base currency of the Fund and the currency of the share class, although there can be no guarantee that it will be successful in doing so. In some cases, investors may be subject to additional risks.

Please contact your financial advisor if you are in doubt of any information contained herein.

For UCITS funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the UCITS Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.

For AIFMD funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the AIFMD Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 32a of the AIFMD Directive.

For the avoidance of doubt, if you make a decision to invest, you will be buying units/shares in the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) and will not be investing directly in the underlying assets of the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s).

This document is issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Unless stated otherwise, all information is as of the date stated above. Source: Franklin Templeton.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.