Skip to content

CONTRIBUTORS

Dina Ting, CFA

Head of Global Index Portfolio Management,
Franklin Templeton ETFs

While the US Federal Reserve has yet to declare a victorious soft landing, the economy has improved markedly from just two years ago. Inflation has cooled substantially and the labor market has returned to a more sustainable path. “The risks to our goals are now balanced,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President Mary Daly said recently. “… data dependence does not mean being data reactive. It means looking forward as the information comes in and projecting how we think the economy will evolve.”

For Daly, this refers to optimal monetary policy. For investors, this can be taken as a cue to stay disciplined and diversified. And in a declining rate-cycle environment, this brings into focus the merits of the often-overlooked US midcap-stock segment. The underallocation is clear: Investments in large-cap mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are roughly nine times greater than those in mid-cap mutual funds and ETFs.1

In recent months, however, we’ve seen a rotation away from the “magnificent” but overvalued technology darlings and toward what we consider more attractively valued midcaps, which feature lower risk profiles than small caps and yet have faster growth prospects than their larger peers.

Since the end of the second quarter, US mid-cap performance (as measured by the Russell MidCap Index) has outpaced that of both large- and small-cap stocks (as measured by the Russell 1000 Index and Russell 2000 Index, respectively).2 Zoom out further and the asset class appears to us even more appealing for long-term investors, with mid-cap stocks (as measured by the S&P MidCap 400 Index) having outperformed their large-cap and small-cap counterparts (as measured by the S&P 500 Index  and S&P Small Cap 600 Index, respectively) over the past three decades.3 In particular, it’s worth noting the average outperformance of midcaps following seven rate-cut periods since the mid 1990s as shown in the following chart.

Exhibit 1: Equity Total Returns Following First Fed Rate Cuts

Average Cumulative Total Returns Following First Fed Rate Cuts
Includes Seven Rate Cut Periods Since July 13, 1990

Note: These are average total returns for seven rate-cut periods beginning on July 13, 1990, July 6, 1995, September 29, 1998, January 3, 2001, September 18, 2007, August 1, 2019, and March 16, 2020. Data for S&P 400 is available from July 1, 1991.

Sources: Bloomberg, S&P Dow Jones Indices, Russell Indices. Large Cap = S&P 500; Mid Cap = S&P 400. The S&P MidCap 400 Index is designed to measure the performance of 400 mid-sized companies, reflecting the distinctive risk and return characteristics of this market segment. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.

A rate-cutting cycle tends to foster a stimulative environment since smaller firms tend to borrow more than larger companies. With rate cuts setting the stage for lowered debt servicing costs, we believe this could serve as a catalyst for improved mid-cap earnings, and generally view this as an opportunity for investors to plug gaps in allocation exposure given the potential for a mid-cap comeback.

For some perspective on the valuation opportunity, midcaps in late October were trading at 20.6x, a relative discount to large-cap stocks, which have been trading higher (at 24.6 times earnings) than their 20-year average (of 19.4x).4

Another attractive characteristic is the relative sector diversification of midcaps to large caps. Given ongoing artificial intelligence (AI) concentration concerns, it’s worth noting that at the end of September, technology holdings comprised more than 31% of the S&P 500 Index and more than 34% of the large-cap focused Russell 1000 Index compared to just about 9% of the S&P 400 Index and 12% in the Russell MidCap Index.5

And while utility companies were the best performers (+29% total returns year-to-date through October 14, 2024) for the mid-cap index, they held the lowest weighting within large-cap benchmarks. Industrials and materials sectors, which are underrepresented in the large-cap universe, may also be poised for expansion considering recent US stimulus bills aimed at building-out US manufacturing capabilities.

This is not to say AI-related firms may not still see impressive growth, but the pace of growth may decelerate and open the door for other segments of the market to shine, as smaller firms become less hampered by debt.

Exhibit 2: MidCaps Sector Breakdown

Sector Breakdown, US Large- and Mid-Cap Exposures
As of September 30, 2024

Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices. Large Cap = S&P 500; Mid Cap = S&P 400. The S&P MidCap 400 Index is designed to measure the performance of 400 mid-sized companies, reflecting the distinctive risk and return characteristics of this market segment. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.

Boosted in part by soft landing hopes, midcaps have been enjoying improved earnings guidance and we’ve seen several companies on a positive growth trajectory. According to FTSE Russell, more than two dozen constituents rose through the ranks from the Russell 2000 to join the Russell MidCap Index during this year’s portfolio reconstitution, with the highest number and weight of graduates coming from the technology industry.

To end on an optimistic note and quote from Fed President Daly: “A durable and sustained expansion allows everyone to thrive, and history tells us it is possible.”

Endnotes

  1. Source: Morningstar, as of September 30, 2024. Compares Morningstar large-cap blend/growth value categories vs. mid-cap blend/growth value categories.
  2. Source: Bloomberg, as of October 21, 2024. The Russell MidCap Index measures performance of the 800 smallest companies in the Russell 1000 Index. The Russell 1000 Index is a US stock market index that tracks the highest-ranking 1,000 stocks in the Russell 3000 Index, which represent about 93% of the total market capitalization of that index. The Russell 2000 is a small-cap US stock market index that makes up the smallest 2,000 stocks in the Russell 3000 Index. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.
  3. Source: Bloomberg, as of October 21, 2024. The S&P MidCap 400 Index is designed to measure the performance of 400 mid-sized companies, reflecting the distinctive risk and return characteristics of this market segment. The S&P Small Cap 600 Index seeks to measure the small-cap segment of the US equity market. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.
  4. Source: Bloomberg, as of October 23, 2024. There is no assurance that any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized.
  5. Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices and FTSE Russell, as of September 30, 2024.

 

WHAT ARE THE RISKS?

All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal. Small- and mid-cap stocks involve greater risks and volatility than large-cap stocks. Large-capitalization companies may fall out of favor with investors based on market and economic conditions.

ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade above or below the ETF’s net asset value. Brokerage commissions and ETF expenses will reduce returns. ETF shares may be bought or sold throughout the day at their market price on the exchange on which they are listed. However, there can be no guarantee that an active trading market for ETF shares will be developed or maintained or that their listing will continue or remain unchanged. While the shares of ETFs are tradable on secondary markets, they may not readily trade in all market conditions and may trade at significant discounts in periods of market stress.

Copyright ©2025. Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.

This document is intended to be of general interest only. This document should not be construed as individual investment advice or offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any shares of fund. The information provided for any individual security mentioned is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investments involves risks. Value of investments may go up as well as down and past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. The investment returns are calculated on NAV to NAV basis, taking into account of reinvestments and capital gain or loss. The investment returns are denominated in stated currency, which may be a foreign currency other than USD and HKD (“other foreign currency”). US/HK dollar-based investors are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the US/HK dollar / other foreign currency exchange rate. Please refer to the offering documents for further details, including the risk factors.

The data, comments, opinions, estimates and other information contained herein may be subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that an investment product will meet its objective and any forecasts expressed will be realized. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where an investment product invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where an investment product invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the investment product. Where an investment product invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified investment product. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from use of this document or any comment, opinion or estimate herein. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any share class with “(Hedged)” in its name will attempt to hedge the currency risk between the base currency of the Fund and the currency of the share class, although there can be no guarantee that it will be successful in doing so. In some cases, investors may be subject to additional risks.

Please contact your financial advisor if you are in doubt of any information contained herein.

For UCITS funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the UCITS Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.

For AIFMD funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the AIFMD Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 32a of the AIFMD Directive.

For the avoidance of doubt, if you make a decision to invest, you will be buying units/shares in the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) and will not be investing directly in the underlying assets of the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s).

This document is issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Unless stated otherwise, all information is as of the date stated above. Source: Franklin Templeton.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.