Skip to content

What happened?

First Republic Bank, the 14th largest US bank, was put into Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) receivership this morning after a competitive bidding process over the weekend that resulted in JPMorgan (JPM) assuming all of the bank’s $92 billion in deposits and substantially all of its assets, $173 billion of loans and $30 billion of securities. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) chose JPM given that its bid was the lowest cost and most efficient option (per the FDIC’s assessment), at an estimated loss of $13 billion to the FDIC Insurance Fund1 (for comparison, the estimated cost of Silicon Valley Bank was $20 billion and Signature Bank’s cost was $2.5 billion).2 As part of the transaction, First Republic Bank 's 84 branches in eight states reopened as branches of JPM (Chase Bank) today, and all First Republic Bank depositors will become depositors of JPM with full access to their deposits. With three of the four biggest US bank failures in history having taken place so far in 2023, First Republic Bank is now the second-largest US bank failure after Washington Mutual (which JPM also took over back in 2008).3

JPM was able to customize an extremely attractive transaction with minimal downside risk and considerable upside in most probable scenarios. For example, JPM is not buying First Republic Bank equity nor assuming First Republic Bank's debt or preferreds, both of which are trading in the low single digits this morning. JPM is also protected from potential litigation with considerable support in terms of the following: (1) considerable loss sharing on the low-risk loan book, at 80% loss coverage for seven years on residential mortgages and five years for commercial real estate; (2) the FDIC will provide a new $50 billion, 5-year fixed-rate term financing and (3) favorable capital treatment of 25% risk-weighting for loans, given the FDIC loss-share agreements.4 JPM's stock is up roughly 3% on the announcement given the attractive deal economics alongside a complementary branch network and customer base, and meaningful wealth management assets.5

Market implications

We view JPM's First Republic Bank takeover as a positive outcome for the US banking system, JPM and First Republic Bank depositors. Systemic fears should decrease going forward as we believe the US banking system is healthy, and First Republic Bank will likely be the last major US bank to fail in this cycle. Silicon Valley, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank are clear examples of underregulated banks with high asset growth, large uninsured deposits, highly concentrated deposits/customers and large interest-rate risk mistakes (high unrealized losses on large held-to-maturity portfolios).

Regional bank earnings and business models will continue to be under stress in 2023, given higher regulation (e.g., liquidity and interest-rate risk), higher deposit costs, higher FDIC insurance fees, rising commercial real estate loan losses and increased staffing needed to comply with a more stringent regulatory framework, etc. The regional banking/confidence crisis will have longer-term effects on increased consolidation, more regulation, more rating downgrades and more differentiation. We also believe investors will require greater yield for regional banks and operating company bank bonds, given almost complete losses with First Republic and Signature Banks' operating company bonds.

Despite the aforementioned headwinds, deposit (out)flows in Q1 out of regional banks were manageable (with First Republic Bank as the outlier) and have stabilized overall. We think this is the beginning of the end of the banking system stresses caused by the rapid rate hikes over the past year and a half. Market reaction so far has been relatively muted, and bank stocks were mixed overall at the time of this writing, with some large money center bank equity up on the day while regional bank equity is down about 2%-3%. Spreads are a touch wider (+1 to +3 basis points) in both large money center banks and regional banks today, which is broadly in line with the rest of investment-grade credit markets. The bottom line here is that this was a good outcome for the US banking system, JPM and First Republic Bank depositors, but a worst-case outcome for First Republic Bank investors.



Copyright ©2025. Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.

This document is intended to be of general interest only. This document should not be construed as individual investment advice or offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any shares of fund. The information provided for any individual security mentioned is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investments involves risks. Value of investments may go up as well as down and past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. The investment returns are calculated on NAV to NAV basis, taking into account of reinvestments and capital gain or loss. The investment returns are denominated in stated currency, which may be a foreign currency other than USD and HKD (“other foreign currency”). US/HK dollar-based investors are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the US/HK dollar / other foreign currency exchange rate. Please refer to the offering documents for further details, including the risk factors.

The data, comments, opinions, estimates and other information contained herein may be subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that an investment product will meet its objective and any forecasts expressed will be realized. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where an investment product invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where an investment product invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the investment product. Where an investment product invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified investment product. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from use of this document or any comment, opinion or estimate herein. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any share class with “(Hedged)” in its name will attempt to hedge the currency risk between the base currency of the Fund and the currency of the share class, although there can be no guarantee that it will be successful in doing so. In some cases, investors may be subject to additional risks.

Please contact your financial advisor if you are in doubt of any information contained herein.

For UCITS funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the UCITS Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.

For AIFMD funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the AIFMD Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 32a of the AIFMD Directive.

For the avoidance of doubt, if you make a decision to invest, you will be buying units/shares in the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) and will not be investing directly in the underlying assets of the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s).

This document is issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Unless stated otherwise, all information is as of the date stated above. Source: Franklin Templeton.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.