Skip to content

Preview

“We strive to live at the intersection where new ideas can make great long-term investments.” This quote remains as relevant today as it was when we first published it in 2018. I like it because it says something complex, simply. It supports active management and also implies an absence.

Certainly, we look to invest in companies that implement new ideas that yield great long-term returns. However, on the other side of the same coin, we find it equally important to avoid investments in technologies that are changing the world, but in fact, do not yield a meaningful return over the long term. We are often asked this in the form of a question, but not in the framework I just outlined. Instead, it comes with questions such as, “What do you think about 3-D printing?” or “What do you think of Linux?” or “De-Fi?” or the most common one recently, “What do you think of blockchain?” When I try to explain that these may be wonderful tech­nologies but might not make great equity investments,1 I feel that the answer leaves the questioner a bit—well—disappointed.

In this paper, we draw a historical analogy of intermodal containerization and compare it to another technology we think could change the world but may not make a great investment: blockchain. We chose these two innovations because they are likely the most impactful examples of this phenomenon in the 20th and 21st centuries (so far) respectively. Of course, when speaking of the future, all caveats apply. Our mind is always open to new ideas and updating previous ideas in response to new evidence. We are humble. We are not dogmatic. We are rational. In writing this paper, we hope to satisfy some of the questioners who, over the years, may have left feeling a bit confused by our lack of enthusiasm for some of the popular technologies in the press.

Identifying these new technologies and their monetization potential is relevant. When investing in innovation, failing fast is important. It is certainly true that what we do own drives investment performance more than what we do not own; however, it is also important to avoid the shiny objects along the way that can be tempting but ultimately empty. The story of disruptive technologies teaches us that great ideas take time to find their most impactful business model. It is also common that the mismatch between sentiment and monetization can be wide. Nevertheless, history also proves that innovation regardless of its monetization, will continue to transform our society and economy. We hope you enjoy the paper.

Key takeaways

  • Disruptive technologies follow a hype cycle, which is a reminder that world-changing ideas need time to realize their most impactful business model.
  • Shipping container innovation revolutionized global trade through its simple operational efficiency. Massively deflated shipping costs brought about by containerization, while disruptive to the industry, benefited the entire world.
  • Containerization shows how a new idea can create significant value for society (by reducing the friction of global trade) even if there is no lasting “pure play” investment in container innovations.
  • Blockchain may change the world, but the technology has failed to provide investment opportunities commensurate with its impact, much like history demonstrated with containerization.

Read the full paper to learn more.



Copyright ©2025. Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.

This document is intended to be of general interest only. This document should not be construed as individual investment advice or offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any shares of fund. The information provided for any individual security mentioned is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investments involves risks. Value of investments may go up as well as down and past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. The investment returns are calculated on NAV to NAV basis, taking into account of reinvestments and capital gain or loss. The investment returns are denominated in stated currency, which may be a foreign currency other than USD and HKD (“other foreign currency”). US/HK dollar-based investors are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the US/HK dollar / other foreign currency exchange rate. Please refer to the offering documents for further details, including the risk factors.

The data, comments, opinions, estimates and other information contained herein may be subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that an investment product will meet its objective and any forecasts expressed will be realized. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where an investment product invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where an investment product invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the investment product. Where an investment product invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified investment product. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from use of this document or any comment, opinion or estimate herein. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any share class with “(Hedged)” in its name will attempt to hedge the currency risk between the base currency of the Fund and the currency of the share class, although there can be no guarantee that it will be successful in doing so. In some cases, investors may be subject to additional risks.

Please contact your financial advisor if you are in doubt of any information contained herein.

For UCITS funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the UCITS Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.

For AIFMD funds only: In addition, a summary of investor rights is available from here. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) are notified for marketing in various regions under the AIFMD Directive. The fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund at any time by using the process contained in Article 32a of the AIFMD Directive.

For the avoidance of doubt, if you make a decision to invest, you will be buying units/shares in the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s) and will not be investing directly in the underlying assets of the fund(s)/ sub-fund(s).

This document is issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Unless stated otherwise, all information is as of the date stated above. Source: Franklin Templeton.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.